A pen register is similar to
a trap and trace device. A trap and trace device would show what numbers had
called a specific telephone, i.e. all incoming phone numbers. A pen register
rather would show what numbers a phone had called, i.e. all outgoing phone
numbers. The two terms are often used in concert, especially in the context of
Internet communications. They are often jointly referred to as "Pen
Register or Trap and Trace devices," to reflect the fact that the same
program will probably do both functions in the modern era, and the distinction
is not that important. The term 'pen register' is often used to describe both
pen registers and trap and trace devices.
Background
In Katz v. United States
(1967), the United States Supreme Court recognized its "reasonable
expectation of privacy" test. It overturned Olmstead v. United States
and held that wiretaps were unconstitutional searches, because there was a
reasonable expectation that the announcement would be private. The government
was then required to get a warrant to execute a wiretap.
Ten years later the superlative
Court held that a pen register is not a search because the "petitioner
voluntarily conveyed numerical information to the telephone company."
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 744
(1979). Since the defendant had disclosed the dialed numbers to the telephone business
so they could connect his call, he did not have a reasonable expectation of
privacy in the numbers he dialed. The court did not differentiate between
disclosing the numbers to a human worker or just the routine equipment used by
the telephone company.
The Smith decision left pen
registers completely outside constitutional protection. If there was to be any
privacy protection, it would have to be enacted by assembly as statutory solitude
law.